Hi,
I'm not sure which stacking mode to select in DSS.
According to this thread, it should be Median: https://www.startools.org/links--tutori ... r-settings
But according to this tutorial I've been going through, it should be Kappa-Sigma Clipping for Lights, and Median Kappa-Sigma Clipping for flats and biases:
https://astro.ecuadors.net/processing-a ... ky_Stacker
And then according to this thread, it should be Kappa-Sigma Clipping for Lights, and then 'Median Combination' for flats and biases which I'm assuming means Median Kappa-Sigma Clipping: viewtopic.php?f=10&t=720
So, which is right?
That's all!
Thanks, Brendan
DSS settings
DSS settings
Not so much boldly going as randomly stumbling where plenty of people have been before
Re: DSS settings
Hi Brendan,BrendanC wrote:Hi,
I'm not sure which stacking mode to select in DSS.
According to this thread, it should be Median: https://www.startools.org/links--tutori ... r-settings
But according to this tutorial I've been going through, it should be Kappa-Sigma Clipping for Lights, and Median Kappa-Sigma Clipping for flats and biases:
https://astro.ecuadors.net/processing-a ... ky_Stacker
And then according to this thread, it should be Kappa-Sigma Clipping for Lights, and then 'Median Combination' for flats and biases which I'm assuming means Median Kappa-Sigma Clipping: viewtopic.php?f=10&t=720
So, which is right?
That's all!
Thanks, Brendan
Choosing a suitable outlier rejection algorithm depends on how many frames you have (as well as which methods are on offer). Without delving into how they work precisely, a decent rule of thumb is that using Median outlier rejection is most useful if you have ~ 20 frames or less, whereas Kappa Sigma rejection comes into its own with more than 20 frames to work with.
In general, have a look at this section on the website about DSS. You will also want to peruse the other information about starting with a good dataset.
Hope this helps!
Ivo Jager
StarTools creator and astronomy enthusiast
StarTools creator and astronomy enthusiast
Re: DSS settings
Thanks Ivo. I always have (many!) more than 20 frames so that's what I'll go with from now on.
Presumably it doesn't matter too much that I've encoded my entire calibration files library with median?
Presumably it doesn't matter too much that I've encoded my entire calibration files library with median?
Not so much boldly going as randomly stumbling where plenty of people have been before
Re: DSS settings
It's probably not at problem, though Median stacking preserves the bit-depth of the source material and does not increase its precision (it just selects the middle sample and does not perform any averaging, except when the amount of samples is odd). Depending on the depth and fidelity of your signal this may become a problem.BrendanC wrote:Presumably it doesn't matter too much that I've encoded my entire calibration files library with median?
Ivo Jager
StarTools creator and astronomy enthusiast
StarTools creator and astronomy enthusiast