https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1w8Ns ... sp=sharing
Another question unrelated to this one. If I am using LRGB files, do you select linear, not bayed? I am working on the M45 processing tutorial but it appears when we turn on tracking after preprocessing that the older version of ST (I assume that is the reason) it would ask for a different category (stretched i think).
M42 and M31question
Re: M42 and M31question
Many thanks! Will report back on this.torsinadoc wrote:https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1w8Ns ... sp=sharing
Yes, you select 'linear not bayered' (a bayer matrix is something only OSCs or DSLRs have). The older version of StarTools did not discern between data from a bayered source and data from a non-bayered source. StarTools 1.3.5 and up uses this knowledge to establish a slightly higher effectiveness of its Tracking feature (and hence noise reduction precision) for DSLR/OSC data.Another question unrelated to this one. If I am using LRGB files, do you select linear, not bayed? I am working on the M45 processing tutorial but it appears when we turn on tracking after preprocessing that the older version of ST (I assume that is the reason) it would ask for a different category (stretched i think).
Ivo Jager
StarTools creator and astronomy enthusiast
StarTools creator and astronomy enthusiast
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 2:58 pm
Re: M42 and M31question
Thanks. That clarifies things
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 2:58 pm
Re: M42 and M31question
Ok. Im not sure what I did differently to avoid that odd wipe. This was about as good as I could get that data. More importantly i learned all sorts processing information
version 1
version 2
I think this was around 60 15 s unguided exposures with calibration files
It will be nice when I collect low noise better quality data
version 1
version 2
I think this was around 60 15 s unguided exposures with calibration files
It will be nice when I collect low noise better quality data