I'm thinking of upgrading a little - possibly purchasing a zenith star 61 or 73 from my very questionable 70-300mm zoom lens. I have been told that I would also need to invest in a field flattener. Trying to spend as little money as possible, I was wondering if I really need this as startools lens module does something like this anyway. What do people think? Can I get away without a field flattener?
Thanks Richard
Field flattener vs lens module
Re: Field flattener vs lens module
Hi Richard,
Fixing issues during acquisition is always preferred. With a field flattener in place, your stacker will, for example, do a much better job aligning stars. Deconvolution will also benefit from the homogeneous stellar profile that a field flattener affords.
If you can spare the cash, definitely go for it!
Hope this helps,
Fixing issues during acquisition is always preferred. With a field flattener in place, your stacker will, for example, do a much better job aligning stars. Deconvolution will also benefit from the homogeneous stellar profile that a field flattener affords.
If you can spare the cash, definitely go for it!
Hope this helps,
Ivo Jager
StarTools creator and astronomy enthusiast
StarTools creator and astronomy enthusiast
Re: Field flattener vs lens module
Thanks Ivo
That makes sense. I hadn't thought about the registration issues during stacking.
Richard
That makes sense. I hadn't thought about the registration issues during stacking.
Richard