thanks for giving it a try!
Here's your and my rendition:
In my eyes there's not a big difference in terms of overall nebulosity. Maybe the faint parts very near to the upper edge of the image are a bit brighter in your rendition but that could easily accomplished in NBAccent by adjusting gamma in NBAccent. There's a bit less nebulosity in the center of the right part of the nebula in your version but that's probably since you've used defaults in Contrast (I also noticed that and throttled it down). Maybe you got the "mountains" at the bottom of the image better but in my eyes the Ha regions around IC1871 appear rather flat. So overall I think both versions are fair renditions of the target with pros and cons. By the way I don't think my rendition took much longer than 40 min.
What I was surprised actually was that the regions around IC1871 weren't sharper and more detailed in my data. They lack depth. I thought that 13 hours duo NB with my setup would result in a better data. With overall nebulosity I am basically fine.
For my image I had something in mind like this: https://www.astrobin.com/q8z08l/C/ It's crazy that the linked image doesn't even contain 4 hrs and it's better than mine with its 19 hrs but overall I am pretty happy with my version
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon/smile.gif)
Regards
Stefan