Stefan B wrote: ↑Sat Oct 30, 2021 5:33 am
Hi Bob!
Great result! Looks like replacing Astap with ICE worked nicely! Did I get it right that you stitched linear data in ICE? I used ICE only once but I remember that you have to do the overlay manually, right? How do you do this when you basically can't see anything since data is linear?
Regards
Stefan
Thanks, Stephan. Yes, I used ICE to stitch the linear data I got after wiping the individual tiles. And you are correct, there is nothing visible in the ICE screen. I used the automatic stitching feature that ICE has available. Because I had already gone through the process of stitching together the fully processed panels (way back at my original post) I knew how much to rotate the stitched linear result. I was then able to Autodev in Startools and crop the rough edges.
This latest result looks a bit grainy to me, I am thinking about going back to square one and re-wiping the original panels with a much lower gradient % to see if I can clean that up. The original subs didn't show much gradient, but my flats didn't correct the vignetting completely, so I used Wipe to remove that. I think finding a way to clean that phase up will be useful.
I took your suggestion on setting the "downsample" and tried all 4 available values. Still no luck with platesolving, so no stitching is possible with STAP yet. I also just re-read your comment about the dark anomoly filter to a higher value (I used 3 where the luminance data stopped changing) and may give that a run as well.
It is all a learning process for me, and I am getting to understand ST better as a result.
Bob