M3 Blown out core
M3 Blown out core
How can i avoid blowing out the core of M3.
Seems that the stack is good and no saturation, still i don't manage to get M3 center good
Seems that the stack is good and no saturation, still i don't manage to get M3 center good
- Attachments
-
- M3P2 (Large).jpg (292.44 KiB) Viewed 6360 times
Re: M3 Blown out core
Did you try the 'reveal all' or the 'reveal DSO core' presets in the HDR module?
Re: M3 Blown out core
Hmm...i did the opposite.
I use tame core....
I use tame core....
Re: M3 Blown out core
The documentation says
So maybe it's worth a try, since you want detail in the highlights.Reveal - reveals latent structural detail in the highlights
Re: M3 Blown out core
Did 'nt work out .....
Re: M3 Blown out core
Hmmm.... Would you be able to share the dataset?
Ivo Jager
StarTools creator and astronomy enthusiast
StarTools creator and astronomy enthusiast
Re: M3 Blown out core
Sure Ivo, here it is
https://www.dropbox.com/s/95eja5erzimsz ... e.fts?dl=0
I think i don't do the stretch right...
it is 1 hr and 40 min integration, Canon 800D at 400 iso , 1 minute subs
F:714 mm D:102 mm
Guided, dithered. Stacked in DSS
You will see a satelitte trail, but i can deal with that
Thanks for helping
Freddy
https://www.dropbox.com/s/95eja5erzimsz ... e.fts?dl=0
I think i don't do the stretch right...
it is 1 hr and 40 min integration, Canon 800D at 400 iso , 1 minute subs
F:714 mm D:102 mm
Guided, dithered. Stacked in DSS
You will see a satelitte trail, but i can deal with that
Thanks for helping
Freddy
Re: M3 Blown out core
Thank you for sharing that dataset.
I just did an AutoDev (with an RoI over the cluster), like so; The Reveal Core preset in the HDR module was made for this sort of thing; You can easily reduce the Detail Size Rangein an image like this, to better resolve the individual stars. Finishing off with some deconvolution (you can push it to taste); Is this roughly what you were after?
I just did an AutoDev (with an RoI over the cluster), like so; The Reveal Core preset in the HDR module was made for this sort of thing; You can easily reduce the Detail Size Rangein an image like this, to better resolve the individual stars. Finishing off with some deconvolution (you can push it to taste); Is this roughly what you were after?
Ivo Jager
StarTools creator and astronomy enthusiast
StarTools creator and astronomy enthusiast
Re: M3 Blown out core
Darn,
Thanks Ivo,
I did the stretching like that, why did it not come out like that.
But i did tame core, so that was totally wrong, allthough i did try reveal core,
It is Always processing...i am just better in taking the picture then processing it...so it seems.
Ok so some more excercise. It is the first time i tried to process a globular, from my stack
Thanks for your help
Freddy
Thanks Ivo,
I did the stretching like that, why did it not come out like that.
But i did tame core, so that was totally wrong, allthough i did try reveal core,
It is Always processing...i am just better in taking the picture then processing it...so it seems.
Ok so some more excercise. It is the first time i tried to process a globular, from my stack
Thanks for your help
Freddy
Re: M3 Blown out core
Got it,
Gosh the real important thing here was the :
HDR module - reveal core but expecially the detail size range that does the thrick..
I must write this down, for future globular processing...
i guess actually one has to build up procedures also in processing , depending on the object...
Boy, this object feels like a start over....for my processing skills in ST ...
Gosh the real important thing here was the :
HDR module - reveal core but expecially the detail size range that does the thrick..
I must write this down, for future globular processing...
i guess actually one has to build up procedures also in processing , depending on the object...
Boy, this object feels like a start over....for my processing skills in ST ...